web statistics
Absolutely not! - Bench-Talk
in

Bench-Talk

Where Shooters Gather for News and Talk

Bench-Talk

Absolutely not!

Frequently, observations - regarding precision rifle shooting/reloading - are proffered in terms of absolute value: in benchrest shooting/competition, there is but one absolute: NOTHING is ABSOLUTE . . . following a tangent, or two, we’ll come back to this . . .
 
As more information has become available (shared) regarding the technical aspects of precision, a growing number of shooters handicap their potential by becoming focused on [technical] attributes, many of which are, “lost-in-the-noise”. A surprising number of individuals, locked into the technicalities, never consider how even a minimal ‘wind’ (condition) may affect shot placement on the target - or, enlarge the group. Largely, ‘wind’ remains either misunderstood, or, at best, underestimated.

The principal misunderstanding: the penchant for comparing wind-drift (say for two bullets of the same caliber, but with differing ballistic coefficients -BC) via a relatively large [wind] velocity component (5,or,10 MPH), as opposed to a lesser velocity - say plus/minus 1MPH - a component more reflective of who, on a given day, will win/place/show. A 5MPH mistake is one from which recovery is unlikely.

At a target distance of 200 yards, assuming the mythical/hypothetical and constant 10 MPH wind, at the even more unlikely steady 90 degree vector (angle), the average benchrest quality bullet (from 68 Gr. 6mm through 120 Gr. .30 Cal), will be dragged about 4.1 inches! This is a number which, often, startles even the most experienced benchrest competitors!

Wind-drift is directly proportional to [wind] velocity, therefore, it is easy to visualize a mere 1 MPH change in velocity - while assuming a constant angle - moving bullet impact 0.41” at two hundred yards. Assuming a rifle capable of shooting a perfectly concentric, or, ZERO (0.000”) center-to-center group EVERY time, a two mile-per-hour shooting window results in a full 0.8” of left-to right (horizontal) group size . . . who can ‘dope’ that window? (Note: we won’t even open the discussion to gyroscopic laws, which, being a gyro, the bullet MUST obey. These laws, dictate varying degrees of “vertical” in association with the forces (drag & RPM) applied. Since we either shoot at ROUND (bulls-eye) targets [for score], or, for group, measure the extreme spread, the hypotenuse becomes all important!)

At 100 yards, exposed to the same mythical condition, bullet drift is a mere 1/4th of the 200 yard figure: the 200 yard game, thus, requires a much higher level of wind/condition doping skill: the target size is proportional to distance (doubled), but the cost of a ‘doping’ error is four times greater.

An amazingly high percentage of individuals, with whom I speak, expect to be able to, CONSISTENTLY, shoot sub 0.40” groups at 200yards! This level of precision requires a maximum of 0.20” (0.10 MOA) precision, combined with the ability to ‘read’ conditions (wind) to [within] +/- 1/2 MPH; or, during varying angles, the perpendicular/velocity equivalent, within plus or, minimum 0.50 MPH - who is consistently capable of doing THAT?

Back to the beginning. There is no such thing as absolute velocity - to the degree many believe, the chronographs we use will not precisely measure velocity. Bullets [from the same box/lot] do not share a common (absolute) BC, but, rather, vary: often, considerably! A Doppler RADAR test, conducted at White Sands, NM, of which I am aware, showed a BC range of up to 15% - that, by the way, for VLD type bullets - stuff to think about!

While, using a decent micrometer, we may measure case neck-wall thickness, bullet diameter, etc., to the one-ten-thousandth (0.0001) of an inch - even that producing a merely relative result : one man’s .3080 may be the next man’s .3079, or, 3081 - not particularly absolute - only close. Mother Nature works in degrees of variation. At 200 Yd., a 2MPH wind reading error results in 0.80” of wind-drift - when it come to winnning/losing, that is, “where it’s at.”

So, what’s the point? Initiates should read a little, master the fundamentals, and shoot a LOT - and IN CONDITIONS - not the wee hours of the dawning. [The late] Don Judd, upon delivering my first “real” benchrest rifle - a .222 &1/2 - advised that, “after a couple of barrels, you might begin to “catch-on”! The only absolute: some things never change . . . oh, one more cliche, “don’t sweat the small stuff” . . . RG

Comments

 

Larry Cribbs said:

Right on track Randy..........the technical boils down to uniform and consistant........that is done by mechanical efforts.  That done, it is down to the eye, the brain, the trigger finger.......and the decision making ability of the shooter.  One item that cannot be taught, learned, programmed, or injected.  The shooter has to have the ultimate confidence in the ability to put the hole in the target where it is supposed to be.  If you have no confidence your results will always suffer.....you gotta know you can do it..............Larry

July 30, 2010 1:52 PM

About R.G. Robinett

I was born in Iowa, but raised (mostly) in the Peoples Republic of California - fortunately, my tenure there was terminated just pior to the complete "take-over" by the tree huggers! ;) In my youth, my pals and I spent most of our free time shooting "diggers" (ground squirrels) and jack-rabbits: during the mid ot late 1960's, private land access, for "varmint" hunting/shooting was readily obtained. My interest in precision dates to my initiation to rifles - I never liked to miss; especially when I knew the miss was the fault of the rifle and not my own. So, upon receiving my first center-fire rifle and simultaneous reloading instruction from a "wild-catter" Pal of my Dad's, my quest for the ultimate in precision began. And the mission continues to this day. By the time I graduated from high school, and ever since, I've not owned a rifle which I could blame for a miss [on game]. While I have had a couple of (rare) dog barrels, few of the custom barrels I've owned since 1974 have been disappointing. These days, blessed with a plethora of excellent rifle and reloading components, when it comes to precision, I am usually the "weak link". :( At the age of [almost] 16, I shot my first mule deer - a real beauty - a 4x4, which scores 168 B&C points! That deer was shot near Ice House Reservoir, in Eldorado County, CA. It took many seasons to find and shoot a comparable muley buck! ;) Still, I have never outgrown the mystique of hunting mule deer, and have been fortunate to have seen and had many opportunities to shoot 160+ inch bucks . . but, never, with a tag in hand, have I had the opportunity to shoot a truly BIG (190" +) muley. Thus, accomplishing that feat remains my dream. For many years, red fox and coyote hunting were on the front burner . . . now, they are a distant second. But they'd better hope I never find that BIG mule deer - priorities could change! ;) Between hunting forays, I occupy my time making a custom bullets and dabbling in benchrest tournaments.
Copyright Bench-Talk.com 2003-2010
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems