web statistics
October 2007 - Posts - Bench-Talk
in

Bench-Talk

Where Shooters Gather for News and Talk

Bench-Talk

October 2007 - Posts

  • Smith & Wesson Stock Drop

    Wow!  What a drop for Smith and Wesson Holding Company.

     They attributed it to a warm fall, but I would have to believe there is more at work here than that. Looking at the one year graph it isn't like they were stuggling as far as price, so it's hard to believe that the investors we're fed up with lack of gains and bailed.

     

     

     

     

  • Hunter Class Benchrest..time for a change?

       Thanks to Stan and Ryan for allowing me to 'blog' a bit. Basically, a 'blog' is a form of editorializing...so here we go. Might as well make my first one a dandy, right?

       For the past several years, I've felt that it was time for the Hunter Benchrest Class to make some changes to encourage new shooters into what is, quite honestly, a class whose popularity is waning somewhat...at least on a National level. With a few exceptions, Hunter Class shooting has dwindled to a few participants in the East which has traditionally been one of the strongholds of Hunter shooting. In the middle of the country, interest remains strong and growing thanks to the implementation of the Two Gun Score format by the IBS. In the West, we've seen a dropoff in competitors at the traditionally NBRSA sanctioned ranges.

       The reasons for this are many and varied. From the increasing age of the competitors making it hard to deal with the 6 power scope limitations, to shooters just moving on to other forms of BR competition, to the almost complete disappearance of the TCL results from the pages of Precision Shooting Magazine. But the fact remains, in my view, that we as competitors need to address this situation by the means available to us via the IBS and the NBRSA to both save and strengthen 6 Power BR shooting.

        I feel the most positive step we could make would be to drop the case capacity rule requiring IBS and NBRSA legal Hunter rifles to hold the water capacity of a 30-30. This has been defined as 45.0 or 45.5 gr. of water depending on which rule book we are reading.

       By allowing the use of smaller cases, we would remove the daunting task of case forming, the making or purchasing of custom dies, and the whole element of reamers that may or may not fit the case or chamber. Are all of these things insurmountable obstacles? Certainly not...as many have been very successful at this for many years.

        But for the aspiring Hunter newcomer that is looking to put one of these together, the mind numbing mix of components and case forming is akin to summiting Mt. Everest. Many just take a pass at this point, leaving the class poorer for their non participation.

       To me, the salvation of Hunter Benchrest could very well be the 30BR. It offers well established reamer designs that are proven winners, great Lapua brass, simple neck up-turn-and-shoot case prep, incredible accuracy and long barrel life. Plus, most of the shooters interested in Hunter probably already have plenty of experience with the 30BR, making the transition pretty easy.

       The IBS could combine Hunter and Varmint Hunter and have simply one class, called either Varmint Hunter or Hunter. The NBRSA shooters wouldn't have to change a thing on their rigs if they didn't want to. The bigger 'traditional' cases work great for those that use the 135-150 gr. bullets, so they would be at no disadvantage. None of what we've come to consider the true defining parameters of 6 Power BR shooting would change: the 2.25" stock and the 6 Power scope.

       Looking foward to your feedback on this.

        Good shootin'.   -Al

       

  • "This is a test" . . . maybe . . .

    Stan and Ryan have graciously granted me "Blogger" status; having their trust is an honor. Thank you, Stan and Ryan.

    During my senior year of High School, way back in 1967, in the Peoples Republic of Carifornia (cation), we were advised: "by the year 2000 (who'd EVER live that long?), the world will experience a return to "Ice-age" status; there will massive starvation and "shrinkage" of the oceans, as polar ice forms . . ." Well, so much for "scientists" taking a billionth of a nanno second snap-shot of geologic time and extrapolating a result . . . but I'm not going to "go political", I just had to vent . . . and I wonder, what has really changed in the last 40 years; I'd guess sunspots and politics.

    What I really want to do is see if I can "import" a pic, or, if, when I go on my hunting rant, viewers, in order to view the pics, must be sent to the photo gallery - here goes . . . ok, I didn't get it figured out . . . and now, I've got to get to work. I may return later. RG

  • SHOOT THRU

     

     Shoot thru's..... I hate them, but first let’s see both sides of the story. First of all going to a shoot is an event for me. The closest shoot I go to is a 4 hour drive. I normally leave on Friday so I can get to the range and set up my gear and get my bench assignment and set flags. I like to shoot a few rounds to make sure everything is ok and nothing has shook loose or out of place. Of course it’s also nice to get caught up with all the old socks on the latest news and remember whens. I am relaxed because I don't have a cell phone and I am going to have a great weekend even if I don't shoot like I want to. So, it makes no difference to me if I get to leave the range 30 minutes earlier than normal or an hour later. I came here to enjoy it and I am going to. The biggest problem I have with it is the fact that when shooting the HBR class with the 6X scope at 200 yards, even with 10 minutes the sighter  is so full of holes  its hard to see  where the last round went. With a warm up I can play with the sighter and if I want to I can use all 5 bulls for a sighter to check the different wind conditions if I so desire. The 30 minutes or so saved does not mean much to me at this point. I do understand the number of shooters and benches plays a part in this also, but getting home ASAP does not enter my mind because I am focused on shooting and not how quick I can get home.

    Now for the other side of the story...... I can also understand that the match director, target crew may have different ideas. Most work for the weekend with little or no pay and maybe would like to get home to family and finish the weekend with them. I also understand that when I leave, their work is not done until the place is cleaned up and backers etc. are put away and probably some computer work to finish. So, they probably have a couple of hours of work or more to complete before they can go home. 

    What can we do to satisfy both of us?  Well, normally many of the shooters that have come any distance are there Friday and the ones that are close sometimes come later in the afternoon on Friday or early Saturday morning. At the last shoot I was at I was there by 7:00 A.M. and a good majority was there by 7:30. By 8:00 just about everyone that was going to come was there. How about starting at 8:30 instead of 9:00 and gain the time supposedly lost by having a warm up? I don't think it would put a strain on anyone. This would be one way of doing it and I am sure I am going to get some comments on this blog and that’s good. We need a good discussion on it. So, feel free to reply and voice your opinion. Maybe someone else has a good idea. Remember one thing. “A good idea doesn't care who has it”

    Posted Oct 02 2007, 10:10 PM by Stan Ware with 6 comment(s)
    Filed under:
Copyright Bench-Talk.com 2003-2010
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems